Governance, Risk, and Compliance Becoming a Funding Gatekeeper for Indian Startups

With times changing, governance, risk, and compliance – commonly referred to as GRC- has emerged as a critical factor in funding decisions

By Prince Kariappa | Mar 12, 2026

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

Freepik

For much of the past decade, India’s startup ecosystem ran on speed, with founders chasing growth, and investors were often willing to overlook administrative gaps if the product and traction were strong enough.

But with times changing, governance, risk, and compliance – commonly referred to as GRC- has emerged as a critical factor in funding decisions, as investors increasingly scrutinise how startups manage regulatory obligations, corporate governance, and documentation.

In many cases, the biggest obstacle to closing a funding round is no longer valuation negotiations or market strategy, but paperwork.

According to a compliance advisory by Razorpay Rize, 25-30 per cent of startup fundraising deals in India encounter delays during due diligence due to poor documentation or regulatory non-compliance.

“Investors today conduct rigorous due diligence before committing funds. A single compliance gap can trigger red flags, delay funding, or worse—lead to deal cancellations. Moreover, non-compliance can expose your startup to penalties, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational damage that could hinder future fundraising efforts,” said the Razorpay blog.

In effect, nearly one in every three funding transactions can stall because of compliance gaps, highlighting the growing importance of legal and governance readiness for startups seeking capital.

A Maturing Ecosystem Raises the Bar

India’s startup ecosystem has grown rapidly in scale, with government data showing more than 1,80,000 startups now officially being recognised under the Startup India initiative. 

With this growth has come a more sophisticated investment environment. Venture capital funds and private equity investors are deploying larger pools of capital and, therefore, conducting deeper diligence before committing to deals. As a result, governance failures that might have once been tolerated at the seed stage are increasingly viewed as indicators of operational risk.

“Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) is not merely a luxury enjoyed by larger companies; they are also critical for startup businesses. We believe that new businesses with established governance frameworks, proactive risk management techniques, and established processes for complying with regulations at their foundation have a much better chance of achieving sustainable growth than those without these systems in place,” said Piyush Jhunjhunwala, Founder & CEO of Stockify.

A 2023 report by TiE on seed-stage investments found that 28 per cent of term sheets were either retracted or materially revised after due diligence, often because of cap-table inconsistencies, intellectual property ownership issues, or historical regulatory lapses. 

For investors, these issues can fundamentally alter the structure of a deal. If equity records are unclear or intellectual property ownership is disputed, the legal foundation of the investment itself may become questionable.

Jhunjhunwala believes that while compliance is just one element of GRC, it is critical to the establishment of investor confidence, mitigating and preparing for risk through cybersecurity resilience, and developing customer trust in the business. 

“Establishing data governance procedures within an organization’s overall data strategy, creating a culture of transparency regarding data security, and preparing for regulatory compliance early on will help new businesses avoid expensive restructuring later on and develop a resilient and scalable business model with a trajectory toward sustained, long-term success,” added Jhunjhunwala. 

Regulatory Complexity Adds to the Pressure

India’s regulatory environment further complicates the compliance landscape for startups.

A report by TeamLease RegTech found that businesses in India may need to comply with over 1,450 regulatory requirements annually, creating a significant administrative burden. Research from Deloitte also suggests that 68 per cent of Indian startups have faced regulatory penalties within their first three years due to compliance errors, with fines sometimes exceeding INR 5 lakh. 

These penalties can affect investor perception as much as financial performance. A PwC survey cited in the same study found that 73 per cent of investors avoid startups with a history of regulatory issues. 

This is why Shashi Bhushan, Chairman, Stellar Innovations, believes that GRC is a Day 1 necessity, not a post-Series B consideration. According to Bhushan, who cites research data, 38-45 per cent of startups, including those that have successfully identified a product-market fit, fail as a result of operational mismanagement and compliance. 

“In the last five years, India has seen a sharp increase in the penalties imposed on early-stage firms as a result of regulatory non-compliance in areas such as data protection, financial reporting, taxation, and other emergent areas. Early-stage startups need to demonstrate structured governance as a result of the Companies Act 2013 and the rapidly changing data protection laws,” said Bhushan. 

Compared to five years ago,  investors have become much more conservative, and more than 72% of them, especially institutional, are carrying out detailed compliance governance assessments before committing to a funding round. 

“In early-stage startups that are targeting angel or VC funding, having a governance framework that is weak can result in a loss of 10-25 per cent of the expected value of the startup. It is a fact that sound GRC processes, including but not limited to board governance, financial control, risk control, and internal control, not only enhance the confidence of the investors; they have the potential to reduce the time spent on due diligence by 30 per cent or more,” added Bhushan. 

Governance Becoming a Competitive Advantage

For founders who manage it well, however, governance is increasingly becoming a strategic advantage.

A survey by SaaSBoomi and Blume Ventures found that 71 per cent of institutional investors consider legal and compliance readiness a key differentiator between startups. Companies with well-organised documentation and clear governance structures were 40 per cent more likely to close funding rounds within 60 days. 

Many companies now maintain digital “data rooms” containing financial records, corporate filings, contracts, and intellectual property documents to streamline investor diligence.

“Close to 65 per cent of B2B enterprises demand data security compliance or certifications to be declared the vendor before the contracts are signed. Without a well-defined GRC, startups lose out on valuable contracts,” said Bhushan. 

For founders, the implication is clear: governance is no longer simply a back-office function handled by accountants or lawyers. It is becoming an integral part of how investors evaluate risk.

In an ecosystem where capital is becoming more selective and diligence more rigorous, startups that maintain clean documentation and strong compliance frameworks are often able to close funding rounds faster, and with fewer surprises.

Freepik

For much of the past decade, India’s startup ecosystem ran on speed, with founders chasing growth, and investors were often willing to overlook administrative gaps if the product and traction were strong enough.

But with times changing, governance, risk, and compliance – commonly referred to as GRC- has emerged as a critical factor in funding decisions, as investors increasingly scrutinise how startups manage regulatory obligations, corporate governance, and documentation.

In many cases, the biggest obstacle to closing a funding round is no longer valuation negotiations or market strategy, but paperwork.

Related Content